E-Taxi Scheme vs. Traditional Taxi Which is Better for Drivers 2025?

E-Taxi Scheme vs. Traditional Taxi

E-Taxi Scheme vs. Traditional Taxi For thousands of drivers in Pakistan, owning or renting a taxi is more than just a job—it is the primary source of household income. Choosing the right type of vehicle is therefore not a small decision. The amount of money a driver earns at the end of each month depends heavily on daily expenses such as fuel, maintenance, and repairs. In recent years, with petrol and CNG prices rising continuously, many drivers have found their earnings shrinking despite working long hours.

In this situation, the Government of Punjab has launched the E-Taxi Scheme, which aims to introduce electric vehicles (EVs) into the taxi industry. These modern taxis not only reduce fuel dependency but also give drivers a chance to earn more by lowering daily running costs. The real question many drivers are asking today is: Should I switch to an E-Taxi or continue with the traditional petrol/CNG taxi system?

You Can Also Read: Punjab Laptop Scheme Phase 2

E-Taxi vs. Traditional Taxi

At first glance, the difference between E-Taxis and traditional taxis may seem simple: one runs on electricity and the other on fuel. But for drivers, the implications go far beyond this. An E-Taxi has higher upfront costs but much lower daily expenses, while traditional taxis are cheaper to start but more expensive to operate long-term.

To quickly understand the situation, let’s look at a side-by-side overview:

• Initial Investment: E-Taxi requires leasing or installments, while traditional taxis can be rented or purchased at a lower upfront cost.
• Running Costs: Electricity is far cheaper than petrol or CNG, making E-Taxi highly economical over time.
• Maintenance: Electric vehicles need fewer repairs, though battery replacement is costly after several years. Traditional taxis require frequent small repairs, which accumulate into high yearly expenses.
• Earnings Stability: App-based ride-hailing platforms integrate better with E-Taxis, providing drivers with more reliable income streams.
• Government Backing: E-Taxi has subsidies, reduced registration fees, and official support, while traditional taxis operate without any government incentives.

You Can Also Read: Honda CG 150 Installment Plan

What is the E-Taxi Scheme?

The E-Taxi Scheme is part of the government’s broader plan to modernize Pakistan’s transport sector. Through this scheme, drivers can acquire electric taxis at subsidized rates, with easy installments and reduced taxes. Charging stations are being set up in major cities, and maintenance support is included to encourage adoption.

The initiative is currently active in Punjab and Sindh, where pilot programs have already provided hundreds of drivers with electric taxis. The ultimate goal is to improve urban air quality, reduce fuel imports, and give drivers a long-term solution to rising fuel costs. By shifting towards E-Taxis, the government is also promoting a more sustainable public transport model.

Core Features of the E-Taxi Scheme:

• Subsidized vehicle financing with low-interest installments
• Reduced registration and token taxes for electric taxis
• Access to government-supported charging stations
• Warranty and service facilities included in the program

You Can Also Read: Punjab 3 Marla Scheme 2025

What is a Traditional Taxi System?

The traditional taxi system has been the backbone of Pakistan’s urban transport for decades. Drivers either own the vehicle or rent it daily from an owner. These taxis usually run on petrol or CNG and rely on customers flagging them down on the street or through local contracts.

While traditional taxis have served reliably for years, they are becoming less profitable. Fuel prices are unpredictable, and older vehicles often need frequent repairs. At the same time, passenger demand for traditional taxis is falling as customers increasingly prefer the comfort and safety of ride-hailing apps.

Typical Features of Traditional Taxis:

• Petrol or CNG-based engines
• Daily or weekly rental options for drivers
• Street-based customer pickups, with no reliance on apps
• Frequent maintenance due to aging vehicles

You Can Also Read: Pakistan Passport Policy Update: NADRA

Cost Comparison Which is More Profitable?

Cost is the most critical factor for drivers deciding between the two systems. While E-Taxis demand higher upfront payments, their long-term running costs are much lower. Traditional taxis, on the other hand, may be affordable to start but drain drivers with heavy monthly fuel and repair bills.

Here’s a clear side-by-side cost comparison:

From this table, it becomes clear that the real savings with E-Taxis come from daily running costs. Drivers save up to PKR 15,000 every month on fuel alone. Over a year, these savings can reach nearly PKR 200,000, enough to cover a large portion of lease payments.

Earnings Potential for Drivers

Earnings depend not just on expenses but also on customer demand. In big cities, app-based ride-hailing has become the dominant choice for passengers. E-Taxis integrate perfectly with platforms like Careem, Uber, and InDrive, giving drivers a steady flow of rides.

Traditional taxi drivers rely on street pickups, which are unpredictable and declining in demand. This means their income is less stable and more vulnerable to off-peak hours.

Ways E-Taxi Drivers Can Increase Earnings:

• Use ride-hailing apps to secure consistent rides
• Take advantage of peak-hour surge pricing
• Save more from reduced fuel costs
• Attract customers with better comfort and safety

You Can Also Read: Himmat Card 2025 Registration and Loan Details 

Maintenance, Battery and Long-Term Expenses

Another key factor is maintenance. E-Taxis have simpler engines, which reduces the need for frequent servicing. Routine oil changes, engine overhauls, and CNG kit problems—common with traditional taxis—do not exist with electric vehicles. However, E-Taxis do require a battery replacement after several years, which can be costly if not covered by warranty.

Traditional taxis often demand small but regular repairs that quickly add up. These frequent expenses cut into drivers’ earnings, leaving them with less profit at the end of the month. For drivers planning to stay in the industry long-term, E-Taxi is clearly the more economical choice.

Comfort, Safety and Passenger Preference

Passengers in urban areas are becoming more selective. Most riders prefer vehicles that are comfortable, air-conditioned, and safe. E-Taxis meet these expectations with modern designs, GPS tracking, and app-based monitoring. For drivers, this means more satisfied customers and higher ratings on ride-hailing platforms.

Traditional taxis, being older and less comfortable, often struggle to meet modern passenger demands. Poor air-conditioning, worn-out seats, and safety concerns discourage customers from choosing them. This shift in passenger preference is another reason why E-Taxis are gaining popularity in big cities.

You Can Also Read: CM Punjab Green Credit Program 2025

Government Support and Future Outlook

The most significant difference between the two systems is government backing. E-Taxis are supported by financing schemes, reduced taxes, and official infrastructure projects. This shows that the future of public transport in Pakistan is moving towards electric vehicles.

Traditional taxis, on the other hand, receive no support. As policies increasingly favor cleaner transport, drivers who stick with petrol or CNG taxis may find themselves left behind.

Government Support Highlights for E-Taxis:

• Low-interest financing and subsidies
• Expansion of charging stations in major cities
• Long-term plans for greener, sustainable transport

Pros and Cons of Each System

To simplify the decision, let’s look at the pros and cons of both systems.

E-Taxi Pros:

• Extremely low running costs
• Strong government subsidies and financing options
• Better earnings with app-based rides
• Modern comfort and safety features

E-Taxi Cons:

• High upfront payments or installments
• Charging infrastructure still limited in smaller cities
• Battery replacement required after several years

Traditional Taxi Pros:

• Lower entry barrier, easy to rent or purchase
• No need for smartphone literacy or apps
• Familiar system that works in rural areas

Traditional Taxi Cons:

• Very high monthly fuel expenses
• Frequent repairs reduce profits
• Declining customer demand in urban centers
• No government support or subsidies

Conclusion

When comparing E-Taxis with traditional taxis, the long-term winner is clear. For urban drivers who use ride-hailing apps, the E-Taxi Scheme provides lower costs, more stable earnings, and strong government backing. Although the initial investment is higher, the savings in fuel and maintenance quickly make up for it.

Traditional taxis may still survive in rural or low-income areas where charging stations are not available, but in major cities like Lahore, Karachi, and Islamabad, the future belongs to E-Taxis. Drivers who adopt this system early are likely to enjoy higher profits, more customers, and greater financial security in the years ahead.

You Can Also Read: CM Maryam Launches E-Bus Project